It is the first
Monday of June and Jan is back today with some simple advice that is often
ignored these days….
WHO SAID THAT?
I really want to know. All the time. In real life, and
when reading.
Nothing makes me more ticked off with a story than not
knowing who’s speaking. And it’s rare anymore for me to read a book where I
don’t find places where I have to reread to figure it out.
Please, don’t do this to your readers. I notice it
happens most often near the end of a story when things are winding down,
answers to questions provided, and lots of characters are talking. Just when
you really don’t want to stop to figure out who’s saying what. Did the writer
get in a hurry and leave off the attributions? Did the author figure that her
characters’ voices were so clear by now the reader would automatically know who
was talking? (Doesn’t happen with me, and I’m sure I’m not alone in that.) Has
the writer bought into the idea that writing “he said” or “she said” is
breaking a rule?
See, you don’t want me wondering about this when I’m
reading your story. You want me to
glide through it, to never have to stop to puzzle out something so simple as
“who said that?”
I’ve been reading and writing for a long time now. A
decade or so ago a very popular author suggested that a simple “he said/she
said” was the best way for the reader to know who was talking instead of using
modifiers or such attributes as “he hissed,” or “he growled,” or said with an
adverb, “she said softly,” or “he grumbled loudly.” This decade, someone else
“ruled” that you should not only not use attributes at all, but instead use
small actions to show what the character is doing and thinking while speaking.
Thus, you may notice a heck of a lot of coffee being drunk now in what you
read. Or tea. It’s so easy to use “Jenny took a sip of coffee” that many
writers do use it. Over and over again. After Jenny takes a sip of hers, John
answers and adds cream to his. How does this add one bit of information or
interest to the story? It doesn’t. Instead, it’s often distracting. Very
distracting if the author only uses this device.
What to do? Mix it up, of course.
1.
Have some characters use certain tics to show they’re
upset (fingering a necklace, tapping a pen, etc.)
2.
Have the occasional character hiss (be sure there’s
some “s” sounds in the words he utters, however) or roar or whisper.
3.
Use “he said” or “she said” when you want fast action
along with the dialogue. Any reader older than ten is used this and won’t even
notice. But they will miss it if they cannot figure out who is speaking.
And they will be ticked. Trust me on this.
One more bit of info about this. With e-readers, things
can get even worse when the attributions are left out because of wonky
formatting. Which is exactly what happened to me just before I wrote this
rant--I mean-- advice. Near the end of a novel by an extremely famous and
popular writer, she left out a “he said” where the formatting got messed up
(big NY publisher, too) and two paragraphs ran together. Or I think they did. I
had to go back to re-read it because at first I thought one person was speaking,
but when I got about four or five paragraphs farther, I thought it might have
been the other character. I’m still not sure I ever got it right because it
went on for eight paragraphs without telling who was talking. There was a small
action in there, but it didn’t help identify the character speaking. In fact,
it made it harder to figure out. What do you suppose I’m going to remember the
most about this novel?
Jan Christensen ©2017
Jan Christensen lives and writes
in Corpus Christi, Texas now, after living on the road in an RV and writing
wherever she happened to land. She concentrates on mysteries, both short and
long. More about her here: www.janchristensen.com
2 comments:
Jan,
Sensible advice. I try to make certain that the speaker is clear as well.
Very good points, Jan. I confess that I often find it hard to show who is speaking by using physical action because, like you, I find it repetitive, but I worry that he said/she said gets monotonous. I'll just keep working at it.
Post a Comment